Uber o tobane le litšitiso tse tebileng le liphephetso

Sengoliloeng sa beke ena, re hlahloba litšitiso le liphephetso tse tobaneng le Uber Technologies, Inc. tse ka fokotsang boiteko ba eona bo mabifi ba ho busa mebaraka e hohelang batho lefatšeng ka bophara.

Sengoliloeng sa beke ena, re hlahloba litšitiso le liphephetso tse tobaneng le Uber Technologies, Inc. tse ka fokotsang boiteko ba eona bo matla ba ho busa mebaraka e hohelang batho lefatšeng ka bophara. Haholo-holo, tsoelo-pele Chaena le New York City li hlahisa lipotso tse tebileng ka bokamoso ba Uber.

Sengolo sa Molao oa Tsamaiso: Litšitiso le Liphephetso tsa Uber

Juggernaut, Uber Technologies, Inc., e kanna eaba e fihlile pheletsong ea boiteko ba eona ba lefats'e ka bophara ba ho busa mebaraka e mecha ea lipalangoang ka sesebelisoa sa eona se ikhethileng se tummeng sa ho palama. Le ha Uber a kile a hanyetsoa nakong e fetileng 'marakeng le Lekhotleng, haholo-holo California, lintlafatso tse ncha Chaena le New York City li kanna tsa etsa hore Uber e emise esale pele.

Uber ea inehela Chaena

Ho nepahetse ho bolela hore Uber ebile ke mothehi-'moho le eena Travis Kalanick o ne a batla haholo ho atleha Chaena. "Leha ho na le tlholisano e matla ea lehae, mmaraka e ne e le o mong oa kholo ka ho fetisisa ho Uber ka palo ea batho ba palameng. Ts'ebetso ea China e ne e le projeke ea mothehi-mothehi oa Uber, Travis Kalanick, ea neng a tsamaea khafetsa ho ea naheng le ho fana ka lipuo tse ileng tsa alima puo ea liofisiri tsa Mokha oa Makomonisi oa China. Thahasello ea hae e ne e tšehelitsoe ke lidolara tse libilione ho tsetela ”[Mozur & Issac, Uber ho Rekisa ho Rival Didi Chuxing le ho Theha Khoebo e Ncha Chaena, nytimes.com (8/1/2016)]. Empa Uber o ile a hlakola folakha e tšoeu mme a inehela ka ho rekisa Uber China ho Didi Chuxing, mohanyetsi ea thata ka ho fetisisa. Uber ka hona e ikopanya le li-armadas tse ling tsa moruo oa Amerika joalo ka Facebook, Google le Amazon tse tsamaileng ka sekepe ho ea Chaena morerong oa bona oa "puso ea lefats'e" hore qetellong ba tlohe. “Joaloka likepe tsa ntoa tsa moemphera tse tsoang Lebopong le ka Bophirimela la Amerika Leboea, lik'hamphani tsena li ne li tla leka ho theha mabala a leoatle kontinenteng e ngoe le e ngoe. Empa ha linatla tsa Amerika li ne li leka ho kena ka metsing a China, 'maraka o moholo ka ho fetisisa oa inthanete lefatšeng, likepe tsa ntoa li ile tsa oela fatše ”[Manjoo, Even Uber Couldn't Bridge the China Divide, nytimes.com (8/1/2016)].


Morero oa ho lokisa litheko

Uber e tsebahala haholo New York City le libakeng tse ling kaha e nkile karolo e kholo ea litekesi, likoloi tsa ho hira le lisebelisoa tsa mehala tse tsamaisang mebaraka ea litšebeletso. Leha ho le joalo, nyeoe e sa tsoa tlisoa, Meyer v. Travis Kalanick And Uber Technologies, Inc., 2016 WL 4073071 (SDNY 2016), hajoale ka pela Moahloli Jed Rakoff oa Setereke se ka Boroa sa New York, mme a qosa hore Travis Kalanick le Uber baa sitisa tlhodisano ya ditheko hara bakganni ba Uber e leng se ka bakang bapalami ba Uber tlolo ya Karolo ya 1 ya Sherman Antitrust Act le molao wa taolo ya dithibelo tsa New York, General Business Law 340 (Molao oa Donnelly), li lefa phephetso ea nnete ho Uber.

Algorithm ea Uber

Ka phapang ea sejoale-joale ea thekiso ea theko ea thekiso, Lekhotla le hlokometse ka ho hana kopo ea baqosuoa ea ho leleka [Meyer v. Travis Kalanick And Uber Technologies, Inc., 2016 WL 4073071 (SDNY 2016)] hore bakhanni ba sebelisang sesebelisoa sa Uber ha ba qothisane lehlokoa le bona theko 'me a ke ke a buisana ka litefiso le bakhanni bakeng sa ho palama. Sebakeng seo, bakhanni ba lefisa litefiso tse behiloeng ke algorithm ea Uber. Le ha Uber e ipolela hore e lumella bakhanni ho theohela tlase ho tsoa litefisong tse behiloeng ke algorithm, ha ho na mokhoa o sebetsang oo bakhanni ba ka o etsang. Lekhotla le boetse le hlokometse "Moqosi o qosa hore bakhanni ba na le 'sepheo se le seng sa ho rera' momori 'hobane ho latela litekanyetso tsa theko tsa Uber ho ka hlahisa litheko tse phahameng ho feta tlholisano… le hore haeba bakhanni ba ne ba itšireletsa ho fapana le konsareteng,' karolo ea bohlokoa ' ha ke lumele ho latela algorithm ea litheko tsa Uber ”.

Hopola Ralph Nader?

Ho hlakile hore baqosuoa ba ile ba leka ho fumana tlhaiso-leseling eo ba ka nyelisang moqosi Spencer Meyer le akhente ea hae. Boiteko bona, bo hopotsang boiteko ba General Motors ba ho hlompholla Ralph Nader kamora ho phatlalatsoa ha buka ea hae e rekisoang ka ho fetisisa, e sa sireletsehang ka lebelo le fe kapa lefe, ka 1965 [en / wikipedia.org / wiki / Ralph_Nader] e ile ea sutha mme ea lebisa ho taelo ea Moahloli Rakoff ea ho qosa baqosuoa, Uber le Kalanick, ka ho sebelisa tlhaiso-leseling efe kapa efe e bokelletsoeng ke mofuputsi oa poraefete eo ba mo hiretseng, ka tsela efe kapa efe. “Ke letsatsi le bohloko ha, molemong oa ho hlahisa nyeoe ea khoebo, moqosuoa oa khoebo o ikutloa a tlamehile ho hira bafuputsi ba ikemetseng ba se nang tumello ho etsa lipatlisiso tsa lekunutu tsa moqosi le moeletsi oa hae. Ho bohloko le ho feta ha bafuputsi bana ba bua leshano hampe ho metsoalle le batho bao ba ba tsebang ba moqosi le moeletsi oa hae tekong ea (qetellong e sa atlehang) ea ho fumana tlhaiso-leseling ka bona "[Meyer v. Travis Kalanick And Uber Technologies, Inc., 2016 WL 3981369 ( SDNY 2016)].

Likarolo tsa Tlhatlhobo ea Uber

Ho arabela liqoso tse 'maloa tsa liketso tsa sehlopha tse behiloeng khahlano le eona, Uber e batlile ho tiisa lipehelo tse tlamang tsa boahloli le litokollo tsa sehlopha tse hlahang litumellanong tsa eona tsa mokhanni [bona likarolo tse ncha tsa Uber tse qobelloang tsa konteraka ea mokhanni, www.eturbonews.com (7/21/2016)]. Likarolo tse joalo li se li atile haholo likonterakeng tsa bareki le tsa basebetsi ho tloha ha Lekhotla le ka Holimo-limo la Amerika le etsa qeto ho AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011) le liqetong tse latelang [Sheba Dickerson & Chambers, Challenges 'Concepcion' in New York State Courts, New York Law Journal (December 29, 2015)] Qalong boiteko ba Uber bo ile ba lahloa ke Moahloli Edward M. Chen oa Leboea. Setereke sa California ho Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 109 F. Supp. 3d 1185 (ND Cal. 2015) le Gillette v. Uber Technologies, Inc., ba fumana mofuta oa Uber o ke keng oa qobelloa oa polelo ea eona e tlamang ea boahloli. Leha ho le joalo, kamora liphetoho tse ling tsa Uber tumellano e ncha ea mokhanni e nang le poleloana e tlamang ea boahloli e ile ea amoheloa ke Moahloli James S. Moody oa Setereke sa Middle of Florida ho Suarez v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 2016 WL 2348706 (MD Fla. 2016) le ke Moahloli oa koporasi Marvin J. Garbis oa Setereke sa Maryland ho Varon v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 2016 WL 1752835 (D. Md. 2016), tlhahlobo e ncha e hanne 2016 WL 3917213 (D. Md. 2016).

Likarolo tsa Arbitration inthaneteng

E 'ngoe ea liketsahalo tse tšosang haholo bakeng sa bareki ba e-commerce le bahiruoa ba lumelang ho hiroa ka Marang-rang e kenyelletsa ts'ebetsong e matlafatsang ea Makhotla a lipallo le lipehelo tse thata, joalo ka tumellano ea tumellano, khetho ea liboka le khetho ea melaoana ea molao le boitlhotlhollo ba mekoloto, hangata bo ipatileng le lihokelo [Bona Dickerson & Berman, Tahlehelo ea Litokelo tsa Bareki ho Mengoaha ea Inthanete, NYSBA Journal (Mphalane 2014)]. Joalokaha ho boletsoe ke Moahloli Rakoff “Ho tloha mafelong a lekholo la leshome le metso e robeli la lilemo, Molao oa Motheo oa United States (o) tiiselitse baahi ba US tokelo ea ho qosoa ka lekhotla. Tokelo ena ea bohlokoahali ebile ea mantlha e ka hlakoloa ha feela mokoloto o tseba ebile o ithaopa… Empa lefats'eng la inthanete, bareki ba tloaelehileng ba nkuoa ba tlohetse tokelo ena khafetsa, mme, ruri, ba fane ka phihlello ea bona ea ho kena makhotleng ka kakaretso, hobane ho nahanoa hore ba lumellane le 'lipehelo le lipehelo' tse telele tseo ba neng ba sena matla a nnete a ho buisana kapa ho qothisana lehlokoa ebile hangata ba ne ba sa li tsebe. Khopolo-taba ena ea bo-ralitaba e lokafatsoa ka linako tse ling, bonyane moo ho nang le qobello e tlamang ea ho arabela, ho buuoa ka 'leano la puso ea tokoloho le lumellanang le pheko' ”.

Tsebiso e sa Lekaneng

Ho its'etleha ka molao oa California le ho sebelisa mabaka a Moahloli oa Potoloho Sonia Sotomayor a ngolla bongata ho Sprect v. Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F. 3d 17, 35 (2d Cir. 2002) (“[r] tsebiso e hlakileng ea boteng ba lipehelo tsa konteraka le lipontšo tse hlakileng tsa tumello ea mantsoe ao ke bareki li bohlokoa haeba lipuisano tsa elektroniki li lokela ho ba le bots'epehi le ho ts'epahala ") Moahloli Rakoff o boletse" Ho sebelisa molao (California), lekhotla la Sprect le fumane hore baqosi ba bang ba ne ba sa amohela tumello tumellano ea laesense e nang le polelo e tlamang ea boahloli hobane tsebiso le tumello e lekaneng li ne li le sieo ka lintlha tsa nyeoe eo ” Kamora ho lekola ka hloko linyeoe tse hlahlobang litumellano tsa "clickwrap" le "browserwrap", Moahloli Rakoff o ile a khetholla Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 109 F. Supp. 3d 1185 (ND Cal. 2015) le Cullinane v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 2016 WL 3751652 (D. Mass. 2016) mme ba tsitlallela hore "Moaqosi Meyer o ne a sena tsebiso e hlakileng" ea Tumellano ea Basebelisi ea Uber, ho kenyeletsoa poleloana ea eona ea boahloli kapa ho hlakisa 'ponahatso e hlakileng ea ho amohela mantsoe ao'

Moahloli Dickerson o ntse a ngola ka molao oa maeto ka lilemo tse 39 ho kenyeletsoa le libuka tsa hae tsa molao tse ntlafalitsoeng selemo le selemo, Travel Law, Law Journal Press (2016) le Litigating International Tort in US Courts, Thomson Reuters WestLaw (2016), le lingoliloeng tse fetang 400 tsa molao tseo bongata ba tsona li fumaneha ho nycourts.gov/courts/9jd/taxcertatd.shtml. Justice Dickerson hape ke sengoli sa Class Actions: The Law of 50 States, Law Journal Press (2016). Bakeng sa litaba tse ling tsa molao oa maeto le lintlafatso, haholo-holo linaheng tseo e leng litho tsa EU, bona IFTTA.org.

Sengoloa sena se kanna sa qopitsoa ntle le tumello ea Thomas A. Dickerson.

Bala lingoliloeng tse ngata tsa Justice Dickerson mona.

SEO U LOKELANG HO SE NKA HO SEHLOOHO ENA:

  • 2016), presently before federal Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York, and alleging that Travis Kalanick and Uber are stifling price competition amongst Uber drivers to the detriment of Uber riders in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act and New York's antitrust statute, General Business Law 340 (Donnelly Act), pay present a real challenge to Uber.
  • Although Uber has met opposition in the past in both the marketplace and in Court, particularly in California, new developments in China and in New York City may have brought Uber's nearly unstoppable advance to a halt.
  • “It is a sad day when, in response to the filing of a commercial lawsuit, a corporate defendant feels compelled to hire unlicensed private investigators to conduct secret personal background investigations of both the plaintiff and his counsel.

<

Mabapi le mongoli

Linda Hohnholz

Mohlophisi e ka sehloohong bakeng sa eTurboNews e thehiloe ho eTN HQ.

Arolelana ho...